Annual Reviews tagline graphic
  Hello. Sign in to get personalized recommendations. New user? Register now.
 
Home Order Browse Search Profile Help Contact Us
Abstract
Annual Review of Entomology
Vol. 44: 535-560 (Volume publication date January 1999)
(doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.44.1.535)
RISK-SPREADING AND BET-HEDGING IN INSECT POPULATION BIOLOGY1

Keith R. Hopper ­
Beneficial Insect Introduction Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Newark, Delaware 19713

Abstract  In evolutionary ecology, risk-spreading (i.e. bet-hedging) is the idea that unpredictably variable environments favor genotypes with lower variance in fitness at the cost of lower arithmetic mean fitness. Variance in fitness can be reduced by physiology or behavior that spreads risk of encountering an unfavorable environment over time or space. Such risk-spreading can be achieved by a single phenotype that avoids risks (conservative risk-spreading) or by phenotypic variation expressed by a single genotype (diversified risk-spreading). Across these categories, three types of risk-spreading can be usefully distinguished: temporal, metapopulation, and within-generation. Theory suggests that temporal and metapopulation risk-spreading may work under a broad range of population sizes, but within-generation risk-spreading appears to work only when populations are small. Although genetic polymorphisms have sometimes been treated as risk-spreading, the underlying mechanisms are different, and they often require different conditions for their evolution and thus are better treated separately. I review the types of evidence that could be used to test for risk-spreading and discuss evidence for risk-spreading in facultative diapause, migration polyphenism, spatial distribution of oviposition, egg size, and other miscellaneous traits. Although risk-spreading theory is voluminous and well developed in some ways, rarely has it been used to generate detailed, testable hypotheses about the evolution of risk-spreading. Furthermore, although there is evidence for risk-spreading, particularly in facultative diapause, I have been unable to find any definitive tests with unequivocal results showing that risk-spreading has been a major factor in the evolution of insect behaviors or life histories. To advance our understanding of risk-spreading in the wild, we need (a) explicit empirical models that predict levels of diversifying risk-spreading for several insect populations in several environments that vary in uncertainty, and (b) tests of these models using measurements of phenotypes and their fitnesses over several generations in each environment.

Full TextPDF

Chain of Reviews: Annual Reviews chapters connected to this topic

Most recent citing papers (via CrossRef)

A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Uncertainty on Reproductive Behaviors
Human Nature 19(4):426-452 (2009)
The influence of pool volume and summer desiccation on the production of the resting and dispersal stage in a Daphnia metapopulation
Oecologia 157(3):441-452 (2008)
Fitness consequences of host use in the field: temporal variation in performance and a life history tradeoff in the moth Rothschildia lebeau (Saturniidae)
Oecologia 157(1):69-82 (2008)
PARTIAL CLUTCH PREDATION, DILUTION OF PREDATION RISK, AND THE EVOLUTION OF INTRASPECIFIC NEST PARASITISM
The Auk 125(3):679-686 (2008)
Virgins in the wild: mating status affects the behavior of a parasitoid foraging in the field
Oecologia 156(4):913-920 (2008)
 
Series Home > Table of Contents > Abstract

Prev. Article | Next Article
Full-text HTML
View/Print PDF (194.4 KB)
Add to Favorites
Email link to a friend

Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to del.icio.us

Quick Links
 • RSS (Series Update Alert)
 • Chain of Reviews
 • Alert me when:
New articles cite this article
 • RSS (Citation Alert)
 • Download to citation manager
 • Related articles found in:
Annual Reviews
 • View Most Downloaded Reviews
 
 
Quick Search
for 
Author:
Keith R. Hopper
Keywords:
facultative diapause
spatial distribution of oviposition
migration polyphenism
egg size
genetic polymorphism

Users who read this review also read:

,
Annual Review of Entomology. Volume 43, Page 63-83, Jan 1998
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (138 KB) | Add to Favorites | Related 

2008 Annual Reviews. All Rights Reserved.
  Technology Partner - Atypon Systems, Inc.