First published online as a Review in Advance on July 1, 2008Decentralization of Natural Resource Governance Regimes
Anne M. Larson1 and Fernanda Soto21Center for International Forestry Research, Managua, Nicaragua; email:
alarson@alfanumeric.com.ni 2Department of Anthropology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712; email:
sotojoya@gmail.com This chapter reviews the literature on natural resource decentralization with an emphasis on forests in developing countries. This literature can be located at the intersection between discussions of good governance and democracy, development, and poverty alleviation, on the one hand, and common property resources, community-based resource management, and local resource rights, on the other. Policies implemented in the name of decentralization, however, are often not applied in ways compatible with the democratic potential with which decentralization is conceived, and only rarely have they resulted in pro-poor outcomes or challenged underlying structures of inequity. Greater attention to who receives decentralized powers, the role of property rights, the notion of “the local,” and the meeting of expert and local knowledge provides insights into key issues and contradictions. Fundamental differences in conceptions of democracy, participation, and development lie behind these contradictions and shape strategies for the redistribution of access to political power and resources, which is implied by decentralization.
Acronyms and Definitions
Accountability: the exercise of counterpower to balance arbitrary action, manifested in the ability to sanction
Governance: the formal and informal institutions through which authority and power are conceived and exercised
Property rights: the actions individuals can take in relation to others regarding objects of value
Most recent citing papers (via CrossRef)

Global Groundwater? Issues and Solutions
Annual Review of Environment and Resources 34:153-178 (2009)