1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Vision Science
  4. Volume 3, 2017
  5. Article

Annual Review of Vision Science

Volume 3, 2017

EK (DLEK, DSEK, DMEK): New Frontier in Cornea Surgery

Abstract

Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) has revolutionized treatment of corneal endothelial dysfunction. Compared with penetrating keratoplasty (PK), EK provides faster and more reliable visual rehabilitation while maintaining the eye's structural integrity. The number of EK procedures is growing annually and surpassed PK in the United States in 2012. The most widely used iteration, Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK), implants healthy donor endothelium, Descemet membrane, and posterior stroma. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) eliminates the donor stromal layer. Although more surgically challenging than DSEK, DMEK provides even faster visual rehabilitation and reduced risk of immunologic rejection, so its use is growing. Potential future alternatives to EK that could help address the unmet demand for donor corneas include removing central guttae and regenerating a central endothelial cell layer from healthy peripheral cells in patients with Fuchs’ dystrophy or injecting cultured human corneal endothelial cells to rehabilitate eyes without residual healthy endothelium.

Keyword(s): DLEK, DMEK, DSEK, endothelial keratoplasty, PDEK, penetrating keratoplasty
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-vision-102016-061400
2017-09-15
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/vision/3/1/annurev-vision-102016-061400.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-vision-102016-061400&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Agarwal A, Dua HS, Narang P, Kumar DA, Agarwal A. et al. 2014. Pre-Descemet's endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK). Br. J. Ophthalmol. 98:1181–85 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aldave AJ, Chen JL, Zaman AS, Deng SX, Yu F. 2014. Outcomes after DSEK in 101 eyes with previous trabeculectomy and tube shunt implantation. Cornea 33:223–29 [Google Scholar]
  3. Allan B, Terry MA, Price FW, Price MO, Griffin N, Claesson M. 2007. Corneal transplant rejection rate and severity after endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 26:1039–42 [Google Scholar]
  4. Allen MB, Lieu P, Mootha VV, Bowman RW, Petroll WM. et al. 2010. Risk factors for intraocular pressure elevation after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Eye Contact Lens 36:223–27 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ang M, Htoon HM, Cajucom-Uy HY, Tan D, Mehta JS. 2011. Donor and surgical risk factors for primary graft failure following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in Asian eyes. Clin. Ophthalmol. 5:1503–8 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ang M, Soh Y, Htoon HM, Mehta JS, Tan D. 2016. Five-year graft survival comparing Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 123:1646–52 [Google Scholar]
  7. Anshu A, Planchard B, Price MO, Pereira CDR, Price FW Jr. 2012a. A cause of reticular interface haze and its management after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 31:1365–68 [Google Scholar]
  8. Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW Jr. 2011. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty under failed penetrating keratoplasty: visual rehabilitation, complications and graft survival rate. Ophthalmology 118:2155–60 [Google Scholar]
  9. Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW. 2012b. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: long-term graft survival and risk factors for failure in eyes with preexisting glaucoma. Ophthalmology 119:1982–87 [Google Scholar]
  10. Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW Jr. 2012c. Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 119:536–40 [Google Scholar]
  11. Arbelaez JG, Price MO, Price FW Jr. 2014. Long-term follow-up and complications of stripping Descemet membrane without placement of graft in eyes with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. Cornea 33:1295–99 [Google Scholar]
  12. Baydoun L, Ham L, Borderie V, Dapena I, Hou J. et al. 2015. Endothelial survival after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: effect of surgical indication and graft adherence status. JAMA Ophthalmol 133:1277–85 [Google Scholar]
  13. Borkar DS, Veldman P, Colby KA. 2016. Treatment of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy by Descemet stripping without endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 35:1267–73 [Google Scholar]
  14. Burkhart ZN, Feng MT, Price FW Jr., Price MO. 2014. One-year outcomes in eyes remaining phakic after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 40:430–34 [Google Scholar]
  15. Burkhart ZN, Feng MT, Price MO, Price FW. 2013. Handheld slit beam techniques to facilitate DMEK and DALK. Cornea 32:722–24 [Google Scholar]
  16. Busin M, Albe E. 2014. Does thickness matter: ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 25:312–18 [Google Scholar]
  17. Busin M, Bhatt PR, Scorcia V. 2008. A modified technique for Descemet membrane stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty to minimize endothelial cell loss. Arch. Ophthalmol. 126:1133–37 [Google Scholar]
  18. Busin M, Leon P, Scorcia V, Ponzin D. 2016. Contact lens-assisted pull-through technique for delivery of tri-folded (endothelium in) DMEK grafts minimizes surgical time and cell loss. Ophthalmology 123:476–83 [Google Scholar]
  19. Busin M, Madi S, Santorum P, Scorcia V, Beltz J. 2013. Ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome double-pass technique: two-year outcomes. Ophthalmology 120:1186–94 [Google Scholar]
  20. Busin M, Patel AK, Scorcia V, Galan A, Ponzin D. 2010. Stromal support for Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 117:2273–77 [Google Scholar]
  21. Chaurasia S, Price FW Jr., Gunderson L, Price MO. 2014. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: clinical results of single versus triple procedures (combined with cataract surgery). Ophthalmology 121:454–58 [Google Scholar]
  22. Cheng YY, Schouten JS, Tahzib NG, Wijdh RJ, Pels E. et al. 2009. Efficacy and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted corneal endothelial keratoplasty: a randomized multicenter clinical trial. Transplantation 88:1294–302 [Google Scholar]
  23. Cornea Donor Study Investig. Group. 2008. The effect of donor age on corneal transplantation outcome: results of the Cornea Donor Study. Ophthalmology 115:620–26 [Google Scholar]
  24. Coster DJ, Lowe MT, Keane MC, Williams DA. 2014. A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes: a registry study. Ophthalmology 121:979–87 [Google Scholar]
  25. Covert DJ, Koenig SB. 2007. New triple procedure: Descemet's stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 114:1272–77 [Google Scholar]
  26. Dapena I, Ham L, Netukova M, van der Wees J, Melles GR. 2011. Incidence of early allograft rejection after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 30:1341–45 [Google Scholar]
  27. de Sanctis U, Damiani F, Brusasco L, Grignolo F. 2013. Refractive error after cataract surgery combined with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 156:254–59 [Google Scholar]
  28. Dickman MM, Kruit PJ, Remeijer L, van Rooij J, Van der Lelif A. et al. 2016. A randomized multicenter clinical trial of ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) versus DSAEK. Ophthalmology 123:2276–84 [Google Scholar]
  29. Elbaz U, Yeung SN, Lichtinger A, Zauberman NA, Goldich Y. et al. 2014. EndoGlide versus EndoSerter for the insertion of donor graft in Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 158:257–62 [Google Scholar]
  30. Esquenazi S, Schechter BA, Esquenazi K. 2011. Endothelial survival after Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with retained anterior chamber intraocular lenses: two-year follow-up. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 37:714–19 [Google Scholar]
  31. Feng MT, Price MO, Miller JM, Price FW Jr. 2014. Air reinjection and endothelial cell density in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: five-year follow-up. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 40:1116–21 [Google Scholar]
  32. Fernández López E, Baydoun L, Gerber-Hollbach N, Dapena I, Liarakos VS. et al. 2016. Rebubbling techniques for graft detachment after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 35:759–64 [Google Scholar]
  33. Figueiredo GSM, Jones MNA, Krishna Y, Figueiredo FCD, Larkin DFP. et al. 2015. Transplant rejection following endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in the United Kingdom: incidence and survival. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 160:416–21 [Google Scholar]
  34. Goldich Y, Showail M, Avni-Zauberman N, Perez M, Ulate R. et al. 2015. Contralateral eye comparison of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 159:155–59 [Google Scholar]
  35. Gonzalez A, Price FW Jr., Price MO, Feng MT. 2016. Prevention and management of pupil block after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 35:1391–95 [Google Scholar]
  36. Gorovoy MS. 2006. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 25:886–89 [Google Scholar]
  37. Greenrod EB, Jones MNA, Kaye S, Larkin DFP. 2014. Center and surgeon effect on outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in the United Kingdom. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 158:957–66 [Google Scholar]
  38. Guell JL, Morral M, Gris O, Elies D, Manero F. 2015. Comparison of sulfur hexafluoride 20% versus air tamponade in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 122:1757–64 [Google Scholar]
  39. Guerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO, Giebel AW, Price FW. 2011. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology 118:2368–73 [Google Scholar]
  40. Guerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW. 2011b. Endothelial keratoplasty: fellow eyes comparison of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 30:1382–86 [Google Scholar]
  41. Gupta PK, Bordelon A, Vroman DT, Afshari NA, Kim T. 2011. Early outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in pseudophakic eyes with anterior chamber intraocular lenses. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 151:24–28 [Google Scholar]
  42. Ham L, Dapena I, Liarakos VS, Baydoun L, van Dijk K. et al. 2016. Midterm results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: 4 to 7 years clinical outcome. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 171:113–21 [Google Scholar]
  43. Ham L, Dapena I, Moutsouris K, Balachandran C, Frank LE. et al. 2011. Refractive change and stability after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 37:1455–64 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hamzaoglu EC, Straiko MD, Mayko ZM, Sales CS, Terry MA. 2015. The first 100 eyes of standardized Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus standardized Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 122:2193–99 [Google Scholar]
  45. Heinzelmann S, Böhringer D, Eberwein P, Reinhard T, Maier P. 2016. Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty from a single centre study. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 254:515–22 [Google Scholar]
  46. Ingraham HJ, Donnenfeld ED, Perry HD. 1989. Massive suprachoroidal hemorrhage in penetrating keratoplasty. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 108:670–75 [Google Scholar]
  47. Jones DT, Culbertson WW. 1998. Endothelial lamellar keratoplasty (ELK). Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 39:876 (Abstr.) [Google Scholar]
  48. Khor WB, Mehta JS, Tan DT. 2011. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with a graft insertion device: surgical technique and early clinical results. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 151:223–32 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kruse FE, Laaser K, Cursiefen C, Heindl LM, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U. et al. 2011. A stepwise approach to donor preparation and insertion increases safety and outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 30:580–87 [Google Scholar]
  50. Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Horn FK, Cursiefen C, Kruse FE. 2012. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation: advanced triple procedure. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 154:47–55 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lass JH, Szczotka-Flynn LB, Ayala AR, Benetz BA, Gal RL. et al. 2015. Cornea Preservation Time Study: methods and potential impact on the cornea donor pool in the United States. Cornea 34:601–8 [Google Scholar]
  52. Lee WB, Jacobs DS, Musch DC, Kaufman SC, Reinhart WJ, Shtein RM. 2009. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 116:1818–30 [Google Scholar]
  53. Letko E, Price DA, Lindoso EM, Price MO, Price FW Jr. 2011. Secondary graft failure and repeat endothelial keratoplasty after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 118:310–14 [Google Scholar]
  54. Lie JT, Birbal R, Ham L, van der Wees J, Melles GR. 2008. Donor tissue preparation for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 34:1578–83 [Google Scholar]
  55. Macsai MS, Kara-Jose AC. 2007. Suture technique for Descemet stripping and endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 26:1123–26 [Google Scholar]
  56. McCauley MB, Price FW Jr., Price MO. 2009. Descemet membrane automated endothelial keratoplasty: hybrid technique combining DSAEK stability with DMEK visual results. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 35:1659–64 [Google Scholar]
  57. McCauley MB, Price MO, Fairchild KM, Price DA, Price FW Jr. 2011. Prospective study of visual outcomes and endothelial survival with Descemet membrane automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 30:315–19 [Google Scholar]
  58. McKee Y, Price FW Jr., Feng MT, Price MO. 2014. Implementation of the posterior chamber intraocular lens intrascleral haptic fixation technique (glued intraocular lens) in a United States practice: outcomes and insights. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 40:2099–105 [Google Scholar]
  59. McKee Y, Price MO, Gunderson L, Price FW Jr. 2013. Rapid sequential endothelial keratoplasty with and without combined cataract extraction. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 39:1372–76 [Google Scholar]
  60. Mehta JS, Hantera MM, Tan DT. 2008. Modified air-assisted descemetorhexis for Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 34:889–91 [Google Scholar]
  61. Mehta JS, Por YM, Beuerman RW, Tan DT. 2007. Glide insertion technique for donor cornea lenticule during Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract. Surg. 33:1846–50 [Google Scholar]
  62. Mehta JS, Por YM, Poh R, Beuerman RW, Tan D. 2008b. Comparison of donor insertion techniques for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Arch. Ophthalmol. 126:1383–88 [Google Scholar]
  63. Melles GR, Eggink FA, Lander F, Pels E, Rietveld FJ. et al. 1998. A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea 17:618–26 [Google Scholar]
  64. Melles GR, Lander F, Beekhuis WH, Remeijer L, Binder PS. 1999. Posterior lamellar keratoplasty for a case of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 127:340–41 [Google Scholar]
  65. Melles GR, Lander F, Rietveld FJ. 2002. Transplantation of Descemet's membrane carrying viable endothelium through a small scleral incision. Cornea 21:415–18 [Google Scholar]
  66. Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J. 2006. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea 25:987–90 [Google Scholar]
  67. Melles GR, Wijdh RH, Nieuwendaal CP. 2004. A technique to excise the Descemet membrane from a recipient cornea (descemetorhexis). Cornea 23:286–88 [Google Scholar]
  68. Moffatt SL, Cartwright VA, Stumpf TH. 2005. Centennial review of corneal transplantation. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 33:642–57 [Google Scholar]
  69. Müller TM, Verdijk RM, Lavy I, Bruinsma M, Parker J. et al. 2016. Histopathologic features of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft remnants, folds, and detachments. Ophthalmology 123:2489–97 [Google Scholar]
  70. Nahum Y, Mimouni M, Busin M. 2015. Risk factors predicting the need for graft exchange after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 34:876–79 [Google Scholar]
  71. Neff KD, Biber JM, Holland EJ. 2011. Comparison of central corneal graft thickness to visual acuity outcomes in endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 30:388–91 [Google Scholar]
  72. Okumura N, Kinoshita S, Koizumi N. 2014. Cell-based approach for treatment of corneal endothelial dysfunction. Cornea 33:S37–41 [Google Scholar]
  73. Palioura S, Colby K. 2017. Outcomes of Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty using eye bank-prepared preloaded grafts. Cornea 36:21–25 [Google Scholar]
  74. Parekh M, Ruzza A, Ferrari S, Busin M, Ponzin D. 2016. Preloaded tissues for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 166:120–25 [Google Scholar]
  75. Parekh M, Ruzza A, Salvalaio G, Ferrari S, Camposampiero D. et al. 2014. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty tissue preparation from donor corneas using a standardized submerged hydro-separation method. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 158:277–85 [Google Scholar]
  76. Phillips PM, Terry MA, Kaufman SC, Chen ES. 2009. Epithelial downgrowth after Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 35:193–96 [Google Scholar]
  77. Phillips PM, Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, Hoar K. et al. 2010. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with previous trabeculectomy and tube shunt procedures: intraoperative and early postoperative complications. Cornea 29:534–40 [Google Scholar]
  78. Prasher P, Muftuoglu O, Hsiao ML, Bowman RW, Hogan RN, Mootha VV. 2009. Epithelial downgrowth after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 28:708–11 [Google Scholar]
  79. Price FW Jr., Price MO. 2006a. Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 32:411–18 [Google Scholar]
  80. Price FW Jr., Price MO. 2006b. Endothelial keratoplasty to restore clarity to a failed penetrating graft. Cornea 25:895–99 [Google Scholar]
  81. Price FW Jr., Price MO, Arundhati A. 2011. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty under failed penetrating keratoplasty: how to avoid complications. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 151:187–88 [Google Scholar]
  82. Price FW Jr., Whitson WE, Ahad KA, Tavakkoli H. 1994. Suprachoroidal hemorrhage in penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg 25:521–25 [Google Scholar]
  83. Price MO, Baig KM, Brubaker JW, Price FW Jr. 2008. Randomized, prospective comparison of precut versus surgeon-dissected grafts for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 146:36–41 [Google Scholar]
  84. Price MO, Calhoun P, Kollman C, Price FW Jr., Lass JH. 2016a. Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: ten-year endothelial cell loss compared with penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 123:1421–27 [Google Scholar]
  85. Price MO, Feng MT, Scanameo A, Price FW Jr. 2015. Loteprednol etabonate 0.5% gel v. prednisolone acetate 1% solution after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective randomized trial. Cornea 34:853–58 [Google Scholar]
  86. Price MO, Giebel AW, Fairchild KM, Price FW Jr. 2009a. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology 116:2361–68 [Google Scholar]
  87. Price MO, Gorovoy M, Price FW Jr., Benetz BA, Menegay HJ, Lass JH. 2013. Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: three-year graft and endothelial cell survival compared with penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 120:246–51 [Google Scholar]
  88. Price MO, Jordan CS, Moore G, Price FW Jr. 2009b. Graft rejection episodes after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: part two: the statistical analysis of probability and risk factors. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 93:391–95 [Google Scholar]
  89. Price MO, Price DA, Fairchild KM, Price FW Jr. 2010. Rate and risk factors for cataract formation and extraction after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 94:1468–71 [Google Scholar]
  90. Price MO, Price FW Jr., Kruse FE, Bachmann BO, Tourtas T. 2014. Randomized comparison of topical prednisolone acetate 1% versus fluorometholone 0.1% in the first year after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 33:880–86 [Google Scholar]
  91. Price MO, Price FW Jr., Trespalacios R. 2007. Endothelial keratoplasty technique for aniridic aphakic eyes. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 33:376–79 [Google Scholar]
  92. Price MO, Scanameo A, Feng MT, Price FW Jr. 2016b. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: risk of immunologic rejection episodes after discontinuing topical corticosteroids. Ophthalmology 123:1232–36 [Google Scholar]
  93. Riaz KM, Sugar J, Tu EY, Edward DP, Wilensky JT. et al. 2009. Early results of Descemet-stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in patients with glaucoma drainage devices. Cornea 28:959–62 [Google Scholar]
  94. Rose L, Briceño CA, Stark WJ, Gloria DG, Jun AS. 2008. Assessment of eye bank-prepared posterior lamellar corneal tissue for endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 115:279–86 [Google Scholar]
  95. Rudolph M, Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Cursiefen C, Epstein D, Kruse FE. 2012. Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 119:528–35 [Google Scholar]
  96. Saad A, Guilbert E, Grise-Dulac A, Sabatier P, Gatinel D. 2015. Intraoperative OCT-assisted DMEK: 14 consecutive cases. Cornea 34:802–7 [Google Scholar]
  97. Schlogl A, Tourtas T, Kruse FE, Weller JM. 2016. Long-term clinical outcomes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 169:218–26 [Google Scholar]
  98. Schoenberg ED, Price FW Jr., Miller J, McKee Y, Price MO. 2015. Refractive outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty triple procedures (combined with cataract surgery). J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 41:1182–89 [Google Scholar]
  99. Schwarz C, Aldrich BT, Burckart KA, Schmidt GA, Zimmerman MB. et al. 2016. Descemet membrane adhesion strength is greater in diabetics with advanced disease compared to healthy donor corneas. Exp. Eye Res. 153:152–58 [Google Scholar]
  100. Shah AK, Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, Phillips PM. et al. 2010. Complications and clinical outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with intraocular lens exchange. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 149:390–97 [Google Scholar]
  101. Shulman J, Kropinak M, Ritterband DC, Perry HD, Seedor JA. et al. 2009. Failed Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty grafts: a clinicopathologic analysis. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 148:752–59 [Google Scholar]
  102. Straiko MD, Terry MA, Shamie N. 2011. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty under failed penetrating keratoplasty: a surgical strategy to minimize complications. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 151:233–37 [Google Scholar]
  103. Studeny P, Farkas A, Vokrojova M, Liskova P, Jirsova K. 2010. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty with a stromal rim (DMEK-S). Br. J. Ophthalmol. 94:909–14 [Google Scholar]
  104. Suh LH, Yoo SH, Deobhakta A, Donaldson KE, Alfonso EC. et al. 2008. Complications of Descemet's stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty: survey of 118 eyes at one institute. Ophthalmology 115:1517–24 [Google Scholar]
  105. Tenkman LR, Price FW, Price MO. 2014. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty donor preparation: navigating challenges and improving efficiency. Cornea 33:319–25 [Google Scholar]
  106. Terry MA, Hoar KL, Wall J, Ousley P. 2006. Histology of dislocations in endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK and DLEK): a laboratory-based, surgical solution to dislocation in 100 consecutive DSEK cases. Cornea 25:926–32 [Google Scholar]
  107. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. 2001a. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty in the first United States patients: early clinical results. Cornea 20:239–43 [Google Scholar]
  108. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. 2001b. Endothelial replacement without surface corneal incisions or sutures: topography of the deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty procedure. Cornea 20:14–18 [Google Scholar]
  109. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. 2003. In pursuit of emmetropia: spherical equivalent refraction results with deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK). Cornea 22:619–26 [Google Scholar]
  110. Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, Phillips PM, Shah AK. et al. 2009. Endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs' dystrophy with cataract: complications and clinical results with the new triple procedure. Ophthalmology 116:631–39 [Google Scholar]
  111. Thompson RW Jr., Price MO, Bowers PJ, Price FW Jr. 2003. Long-term graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 110:1396–402 [Google Scholar]
  112. Tillett CW. 1956. Posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 41:3530–33 [Google Scholar]
  113. Tourtas T, Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Cursiefen C, Kruse FE. 2012. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 153:1082–90 [Google Scholar]
  114. Tourtas T, Schlomberg J, Wessel JM, Bachmann BO, Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Kruse FE. 2014. Graft adhesion in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty dependent on size of removal of host's Descemet membrane. JAMA Ophthalmol 132:155–61 [Google Scholar]
  115. Tsui JY, Goins KM, Sutphin JE, Wagoner MD. 2011. Phakic Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: prevalence and prognostic impact of postoperative cataracts. Cornea 30:291–95 [Google Scholar]
  116. Vajaranant TS, Price MO, Price FW, Gao W, WIlensky JT, Edward DP. 2009. Visual acuity and intraocular pressure after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with and without preexisting glaucoma. Ophthalmology 116:1644–50 [Google Scholar]
  117. Vajaranant TS, Price MO, Price FW, Wilensky JT, Edward DP. 2008. Intraocular pressure measurements following Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 145:780–86 [Google Scholar]
  118. Veldman BP, Dye PK, Holiman JD, Mayko ZM, Sales CS. et al. 2016. The S-stamp in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty safely eliminates upside-down graft implantation. Ophthalmology 123:161–64 [Google Scholar]
  119. Wacker K, Baratz KH, Maguire LJ, McLaren JW, Patel SV. 2016. Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy: five-year results of a prospective study. Ophthalmology 123:154–60 [Google Scholar]
  120. Williams KA, Lowe M, Bartlett C, Kelly TL, Coster DJ. 2008. Risk factors for human corneal graft failure within the Australian corneal graft registry. Transplantation 86:1720–24 [Google Scholar]
  121. Writ. Comm. Cornea Donor Study Res. Group. 2013. The effect of donor age on penetrating keratoplasty for endothelial disease: graft survival after 10 years in the Cornea Donor Study. Ophthalmology 120:2419–27 [Google Scholar]
  122. Writ Comm. Cornea Donor Study Res. Group. 2015. Factors associated with corneal graft survival in the cornea donor study. JAMA Ophthalmol 133:246–54 [Google Scholar]
  123. Zeh WG, Price FW Jr. 2000. Iris fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 26:1028–34 [Google Scholar]
  124. Zhang Q, Randleman JB, Stulting RD, Lee WB, Stone DU. et al. 2010. Clinicopathologic findings in failed Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Arch. Ophthalmol. 128:973–80 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-vision-102016-061400
Loading
EK (DLEK, DSEK, DMEK): New Frontier in Cornea Surgery
Annual Review of Vision Science 3, 69 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-102016-061400
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-vision-102016-061400
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-vision-102016-061400
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental Material

Supplementary Data

  • Supplemental Video 1

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error